Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Rebate Model; Contract Pharmacy

• In six appealed cases related to rebate models, plaintiff-appellants filed their reply briefs.
• In a case challenging a Tennessee state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint and the defendant filed a reply in support of its motion to dismiss.
• In a case challenging a Utah bill governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the defendant filed a response to the plaintiff’s notice of supplemental authority.
• In a case challenging a Missouri state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, amici filed an amicus brief in support of the defendants.
• In a case challenging a Hawaii state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a reply brief to its motion for preliminary injunction.
• A drug manufacturer filed two separate lawsuits in Hawaii and Tennessee to challenge state laws governing contract pharmacy arrangements.

Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Rebate Model; Contract Pharmacy

• In five appealed cases related to rebate models, the defendant-appellees filed their briefs.
• In a case against the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) challenging its certification of a group of entities as 340B-eligible, the court denied the government’s partial motion to dismiss.
• In a case challenging a Nebraska state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a brief opposing defendant’s motion to dismiss.
• In a case challenging a Hawaii state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a preliminary injunction.
• Three drug manufacturers and one trade association of drug manufacturers each filed four separate complaints to challenge state laws governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Oregon, Nebraska, and North Dakota.

Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Rebate Model; Other

• In two cases challenging a Nebraska state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, amici filed briefs requesting the court grant defendant’s motion to dismiss.
• In a case challenging a Colorado state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, amici filed a brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.
• In three appealed cases related to rebate models:
  • In two cases, the court granted the plaintiff-appellant drug manufacturers’ motion to dismiss the cross-appeals.
  • In one case, the court granted the plaintiff-appellant drug manufacturer’s motion to consolidate.
• In a case by a covered entity against the government, the government filed an answer to the covered entity’s complaint.

Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Rebate Model; Contract Pharmacy;

• In five appealed cases related to rebate models:
  • In five cases, the appellant filed its brief.
  • In three cases, the plaintiff-appellants filed a reply in support of their emergency motion to dismiss the cross-appeals.
• In one case challenging a state law in Tennessee, the defendant filed a response in opposition to the plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction, and the plaintiff filed a memorandum in opposition to the defendant’s motion to dismiss; and in a second case, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss.
• In a case challenging a South Dakota bill, amici filed a brief in support of the government’s motion to dismiss.
• In two cases challenging Nebraska’s state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the court granted amici’s motion for leave to submit a brief of amicus curiae and, in a second case, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss.
• In one case challenging Missouri’s state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the court dismissed without prejudice [...]
  
  Continue Reading