Find the week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy

• In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a New Mexico state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a notice of supplemental authority.
• In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Utah law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the state government filed a motion to dismiss.
• In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Washington state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the state filed an opposition to the drug manufacturer’s motion for preliminary injunction.
• In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Mississippi state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied the petition for rehearing en banc.
• In two cases brought by a drug manufacturer challenging an Oregon law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgement.

Find the week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Other

• In a case brought by a trade association of drug manufacturers challenging a Maine state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, plaintiff appellant filed a reply brief in the First Circuit in support of its appeal from the denial of preliminary injunctive relief.
• In two cases brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Hawaii state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the defendant filed an answer to the plaintiff’s complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief.
• In a case brought by a drug manufacturer against the government, the government filed a memo in support of the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment and opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and the intervenor-defendant filed a cross-motion for summary judgment and opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.
• In a case brought by a covered entity against the government, the court denied the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and judgment was entered in favor of the defendants.
• In [...]
  
  Continue Reading

Find the week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Other

• In a case brought by a drug manufacturer against the government challenging a West Virginia state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the court ordered the case be stayed generally and directed the case be removed from the court’s docket.
• A drug manufacturer filed a complaint to challenge a Washington state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements.
• In a case brought by a drug manufacturer against the government, an intervenor filed an answer to the complaint.

Find the week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Other

• In two cases brought by drug manufacturers challenging a New Mexico state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiffs filed notices of supplemental authority.
• In a case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Tennessee state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the court stayed the case pending resolution of two similar cases at the Sixth Circuit.
• In two cases challenging a Mississippi state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the lower court’s denial of each plaintiff’s preliminary injunction.
• A drug manufacturer filed a complaint against the government, arguing that the government’s (1) refusal to enforce findings from its proposed audits of covered entities and (2) determination regarding what constitutes a “patient” is unlawful.
• A trade association of drug manufacturers filed a complaint to challenge a Washington state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements.
• In a case brought by a drug manufacturer against the government, an intervenor filed an unopposed motion to intervene, [...]
  
  Continue Reading