Find the week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Child Sites; Other

• In a case against HRSA challenging its certification of a group of entities as 340B-eligible, the plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment.
• In a case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a New Mexico state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the government filed an answer to the plaintiff’s complaint.
• In a case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a New Mexico state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiffs filed a notice of supplemental authority.
• In an appealed qui tam action alleging that various drug manufacturers failed to charge accurate ceiling prices to 340B Covered Entities, the appellate court issued an opinion reversing the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim and remanding the case for further proceedings.
• In a case brought by a trade association for drug manufacturers challenging a Colorado state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the court issued an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction and the plaintiff filed a notice [...]
  
  Continue Reading