Find the week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.
Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Other
- In a case against HRSA challenging its certification of a group of entities as 340B-eligible, the federal government and intervenor-defendant each filed a reply in support of the federal government’s motion for summary judgment.
- In a case challenging the government’s rebate model pilot program, the plaintiff-appellees filed a brief regarding the district court’s denial of a motion to intervene filed by a group of drug manufacturers and a trade association of trade manufacturers.
- In a case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging an Oregon state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, intervenor Oregon Primary Care Association filed a reply in support of its cross-motion for summary judgment.
- In a case brought by a drug manufacturer against the federal government, the intervenor-defendant filed a summary judgement reply brief and the defendant filed a reply in further support of the defendants’ motion for summary judgement.
- In a consolidated case brought by a drug manufacturer and trade association for drug manufacturers challenging a Hawaii state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the third party filed a response in support of the third-party motion to quash.
