Find the week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.
Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Other
- In a case against HRSA challenging its certification of a group of entities as 340B-eligible, plaintiffs filed a reply in support of their motion for summary judgment.
- In a consolidated case brought by a drug manufacturer and a trade association for drug manufacturers challenging a Hawaii state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiffs filed a response to a third-party motion to quash.
- In a case brought by a drug manufacturer against the federal government, the plaintiff filed a reply in support of a motion for summary judgment and in opposition to the defendants’ and intervenor’s cross-motions for summary judgment.
- In a consolidated case brought by drug manufacturers and a trade association for drug manufacturers challenging a Washington state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiffs filed replies in support of their preliminary injunctions, and a group of amici filed an amici curiae brief.
- In three separate complaints, 340B covered entities sued a group of pharmacy benefit managers and their vertically-integrated pharmacies, alleging a breach of contract and violation of state laws.
