Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.
Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; HRSA Audit Process; Other
- In two cases challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Nebraska, the defendant filed a supplemental reply to plaintiff’s response in opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss.
- In a case challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Missouri, amici filed a supplemental brief in support of defendants’ motion to dismiss, defendants filed a reply memorandum in support of defendants’ motion to dismiss, and proposed intervenors filed reply suggestions in support of proposed intervenors’ motion to intervene.
- In three cases challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Maine, one plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction and in two cases, the court denied each plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction and each plaintiff appealed the decision.
- In one case challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Colorado, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss.
- In one case challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Rhode Island, the plaintiff filed a reply in support of its motion for preliminary injunction.
- In one case challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Oklahoma, the plaintiff filed an opposition to defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.
- In two cases challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Utah, the defendants filed notices of supplemental authority.
- In one case challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Utah, the plaintiff filed a response to the defendants’ notice of supplemental authority.
- In four cases challenging the HRSA audit process, the parties voluntarily dismissed the case.
- In one case by a covered entity against an insurance company alleging breach of contract, the insurance company filed a reply brief in further support of their motion to dismiss.
- In one case by a covered entity against an insurance company alleging breach of contract, the insurance company filed an answer to the covered entity’s complaint.
