Find the week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.
Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Rebate Model; Other
- In an appealed case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a North Dakota state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, a group of amici filed an amicus curiae brief.
- In five cases brought by drug manufacturers challenging a Utah state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiffs files opposition briefs to the state government’s motions to dismiss.
- In a case brought by a drug manufacturer seeking judgment on its interpretation of the definition of “patient”, a group of proposed intervenors filed a motion to intervene.
- In an appealed case challenging the 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program, a group of manufacturers filed a reply brief regarding the denial of their motion to intervene.
- In one appealed case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Tennessee state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the defendant-appellee filed a response brief.
- In a case brought by a group of 340B covered entities, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York issued a Decision and Order on defendants’ motion to dismiss.
