Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.
Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Other
- In three cases brought by drug manufacturers challenging an Oklahoma state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, defendants filed a notice of appeal.
- In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Colorado state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, defendants filed a motion to dismiss.
- In two consolidated cases brought by drug manufacturers challenging a Nebraska state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary injunction and a brief in support thereof.
- In two cases brought by drug manufacturers challenging a Utah state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, plaintiffs filed responses to the defendants’ notices of supplemental authority.
- In one case by a trade association of drug manufacturers challenging a Rhode Island state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, plaintiff filed a reply in support of its motion for preliminary injunction.
- In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a North Dakota state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, defendants filed a cross motion for summary judgment.
- In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a North Dakota state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings.
- In one case by a drug manufacturer challenging an Arkansas state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the drug manufacturer filed response to the defendant’s notice of supplemental authority.
- In one case by a covered entity against an insurance company alleging breach of contract, the covered entity filed an answer to the insurance company’s counterclaims.
