Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.
Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Other
- In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a North Dakota state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the defendants filed their answer.
- In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Missouri state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff-appellant filed their reply brief.
- In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging an Oklahoma state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction.
- In one case brought by a trade association of drug manufacturers challenging a Rhode Island state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction.
- In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Maine state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the court granted the parties’ motion to stay pending resolution of the plaintiff’s appeal.
- In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Colorado state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, a group of amici filed a supplemental amicus curiae brief in support of defendant’s motion to dismiss.
- In two cases brought by a drug manufacturer and a trade association of drug manufacturers challenging a Hawaii state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the defendant in each case filed a reply memorandum in support of its motion to dismiss.
- In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Tennessee state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss.
- In one case by a drug manufacturer challenging an Arkansas state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the drug manufacturer filed a sealed response to the government’s motion for summary judgment.
- In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Utah state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff file a response to the government’s notice of supplemental authority.
- In one case by a covered entity against an insurance company alleging breach of contract, the insurance company filed a motion to withdraw its motion to dismiss.
