Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.
Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Other; Rebate Model
- In four cases challenging Utah state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, amici filed a motion for leave to file an amicus brief.
- In one case challenging Nebraska state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiffs filed an opposition to an amicus curiae brief and an opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss.
- A trade association of drug manufacturers filed a complaint challenging a Tennessee state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements.
- A drug manufacturer filed a complaint challenging a Utah state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements.
- In an appealed case challenging a Louisiana law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the court denied the intervenor-defendant’s motion for leave to file a sur-reply to appellant’s reply brief.
- In a case by a covered entity against the government, the covered entity filed a motion for leave to file a response to the intervenors’ amicus brief.
- In two cases against the government related to rebate models, the plaintiff filed an appeal to the circuit court.
